What Does Discount / Premium to Fair Value Mean, and Why Is Negative Cheap?
How far the current price sits above or below fair value. Negative means below the model estimate, positive means above — only as good as the model assumptions.
Discount / premium is the percentage gap between the current price and the model's fair value: negative means the price sits below fair value, positive means above. It measures the distance between a price and an estimate, not whether the stock is objectively cheap or expensive.
How it is calculated
In words: current price minus fair value, divided by fair value, times 100. With a fair value of 100 and a price of 80 the result is −20%, read as "20% below the model's estimate"; a price of 130 gives +30%.
The sign runs opposite to the classic "margin of safety". Value investors usually record "below estimate" as a positive margin, while Stock Compass uses "negative = below the estimate" throughout, because the figure sits next to the model estimate on the card and a minus sign reads instantly as "price is under the estimate". The fair value itself comes from the internal model (earnings, cash flow, peer valuation) — see fair value.
Rules of thumb
| Reading | What it usually means |
|---|---|
| Below about −30% | Far under the estimate; ask what the model may be missing first |
| −30% to −10% | Clearly below the estimate |
| −10% to +10% | Within normal estimation error |
| +10% to +30% | The market pays more than the model would |
| Above +30% | High expectations are already priced in |
These bands are generic reading conventions, not laws, and not labels the app puts on a stock: the card shows only the number. Cyclicals look cheapest against the estimate at the top of the cycle when earnings peak; high-growth companies can sit well above it for years.
What it does not tell you
- Whether the model is right. It inherits every assumption behind the fair value; at low confidence the error can be larger than the gap itself.
- When the gap will close. A price can sit below the estimate for a long time, or keep getting cheaper.
- How peers are priced. If a whole sector trades at a discount, −20% on one name is not necessarily unusual.
In Stock Compass
On the stock card's valuation block it follows "Model est." as a signed percentage, recomputed from today's price, with no zone label. When model confidence is low the row turns grey and italic with a "Low conf" badge; cyclical, ROE-anomaly and model-diverges warnings appear as small tags.
The valuation section of the card's data summary states it as a fact: "Internal model estimate X, as of <date>; the price is 20% below the estimate", with the model's own confidence grade. The date is that of the last successful fundamentals fetch; if the latest fetch failed, the missing-data list says which date the figures are from. The analyst target is listed separately with its analyst count. When the two differ by more than 30% the summary notes it, without saying which one to trust.
In strategy rules the indicator id is margin_of_safety_pct; an example condition is margin_of_safety_pct < -10 (at least 10% below fair value). Writing "> 20" would select stocks 20% overvalued, not a 20% margin of safety. A cheap valuation paired with a falling price is the classic trap — see stop chasing the market.
FAQ
Why does a negative number mean cheap?
Because the formula asks how far the price is above fair value. When the price is below, the answer is negative. This is the reverse of the usual margin-of-safety sign, so check the direction when writing rules.
Is a −30% discount always an opportunity?
No. It is only the gap between a price and an estimate. The estimate can be wrong, and the market may already be pricing in bad news the model has not caught up with. Treat it with extra caution at low confidence or on cyclicals.
How is it different from the analyst-target gap?
Same formula, different anchor: one uses the internal fair value, the other the average broker target. Stock Compass shows both side by side and notes when they differ by more than 30%, without judging which is right.
Definition only — not investment advice.